typewriter-revolution-blog-post-header

do not fear the digits

by | Sep 5, 2015 | Uncategorized | 25 comments

Quiz for über type geeks: what typewriter typed this?

25 Comments

  1. Ted

    SG-1 with an "ea" key? But dang, nicely justified. Too nicely justified for a typewriter maybe?

    Reply
  2. Richard P

    It is typewritten, but not on an SG1.

    Reply
  3. x over it

    Ah, the monospace justification trick! I actually learned that from an ancient DOS word processor handbook. (why I used to read those things I have no idea

    Facit or Torpedo? Or another typewriter whose Imperial Pica/Congress Pica came from the same supplier.

    Reply
  4. Brad

    Torpedo 18, or Olivetti Lettera 22 or Studio 44…the tan ones. Or possibly Halda.

    Reply
  5. Anonymous

    Coxhead DSJ Varityper?

    Reply
  6. RobertG

    En dansk skrivemaskine. (-:

    Reply
  7. Bill M

    The ea makes it look like making the halfspace (or what ever it is called when you can squeeze 2 letters into one monospace) , but it looks more like it is all one slug similar to what I used for typesetting. I have no idea.

    Reply
  8. Bill M

    Just thought of one machine I have with a very similar font and some special characters…Hammond Multiplex.

    Reply
  9. Richard P

    No one has guessed the typewriter so far. Cold, cold, cold. ;)

    Reply
  10. Anonymous

    An IBM Executive could do such an alignment, I believe. Also of course an IBM Composer. IBM Mag Card as well … Something in that area?

    Reply
  11. Ted

    Sphinx! :D

    Reply
  12. The Philosophy Teacher

    The typewriter I have no idea. But the Heidegger is all over it like white on rice, man.

    Reply
  13. The Philosophy Teacher

    Actually I think it's an Adler Universal. Fancy-shmancy one with "margin justification device."

    Reply
  14. Richard P

    I don't think so. Heidegger would deny that calculation and technology are simply our creations and under our control. He claims that the technological worldview is a destiny that has been allotted to us.

    Reply
  15. Richard P

    Ooh! We have a winner for the typewriter model! But there's no fancy justification device—I just retyped the text until it came out right, inserting spaces as necessary.

    Reply
  16. Richard P

    Too sophisticated. DSJ stands for Differential Spacing & Justification. This is monospaced typing; each character takes up the same width. And the justification wasn't automatic.

    Reply
  17. Richard P

    The Danish character is æ, not ea.

    Reply
  18. Richard P

    Yes, it's one slug. It stands for "each."

    Reply
  19. The Philosophy Teacher

    I see. I thought you actually meant fingers by "digits" and thought you were thinking of zuhandenheit. Now I see that you are saying we should regard digital technology as an "artifactual extension" rather than something alien and threatening. But then, what's the revolution about?
    BTW, not to get nerdy or anything, the "ones and zeros fading into a dream" reminds me of a Simpsons Tree House of Horror I once saw.

    Reply
  20. Richard P

    Wow! I didn't know there was an Adler Universal with such a device. Mine doesn't have it. If the Universal with a justifier was manual, it would be the only such typewriter I've heard of.

    I would guess that the principle was the same as on the Varityper: you have to type a line first (but without making any marks on the paper), and then the machine calculates how much blank space you'll need to insert between words when you retype it making actual marks.

    When I'm next in London (next summer) I must visit the Science Museum.

    Reply
  21. Richard P

    I don't want to get too far into philosophy on this blog, but you are right that my text made the connection between digits and fingers, and that in Being and Time, Heidegger would be more sympathetic to the ideas I sketched here. It's in his later thinking that he views technology as a destiny.

    This text was experimenting with a somewhat optimistic and humanistic vision. I am not sure I'm really that optimistic. But even in this vision, there is a need for a revolution: not against the digital as such, but against passive acquiescence to an all-embracing digital paradigm, against the tendency to forget that our mathematics and our machines are our creations, against letting ourselves be ruled by our rulers (double entendre).

    "Not to get nerdy"? Too late for all of us!

    Reply
  22. RobertG

    Ow – and having just spent a week in Danmark too… (:

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VISIT THE

typewriter revolutionary factory logo

Contact

Email

Address

Dept. of Philosophy
Xavier University
3800 Victory Pkwy.
Cincinnati, OH. 45207
USA

TYPEWRITER REVOLUTION on instagram
TYPEWRITER REVOLUTION on facebook